Even Section 13’s penalty section, under which hate propagandists can be fined $10,000, was found by the court to be “a reasonable means of imposing financial accountability for the damage caused by the vilification of targeted groups and of deterring the communication of hate speech in order to decrease discrimination against them.”

The penalty section was a key reason the law was once judged unconstitutional, on the grounds that such quasi-criminal punishment invalidates the remedial purpose of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Now, however, both Section 13 and its penalty provisions are on solid legal footing. national post

S. 13 is a long time dying.

Repealed it has been but the ninnies on the Federal Court of Appeal are happy to pretend that its penalty clause is not a penalty at all. Rather it is “a reasonable means of imposting financial accountability”. Ah, got it. Nothing more reasonable than fining someone. For, after all, there is no evidence at all that any financial harm was done to the complainant. What is basis for the assessment then?

Well, the ninnies are more than willing to provide the answer: “deterring the communication of hate speech”.

Now, wiser folk than I will think that is not a penalty. Just as they will believe a fine for speeding intended to deter speeding is not a penalty. Because they will be able to discern a difference.

I cannot.

Tagged ,

3 thoughts on “Idiots

  1. Dave says:

    And yet herr harper sits on his thumb while rotating. Don’t get me wrong, I like him half a c-hair more than the other dipshits that run the other parties, but it would be nice to see a true CONSERVATIVE and not all these useless liberal lite wannabe’s.
    Didn’t harper say something about eliminating s.13 during the election? I can’t remember.

  2. xanthippa says:

    Harper did kill S13.

    However, it takes 12 months for the law to take effect. Thus, S13 is still the law of the land (as Mr. Richard Warman is so fond of saying) until 1st of July, 2014.

    Which begs the question: if S13 will cease being the law of Canada in 4 months, which justices have shown such supreme lack of judgment as to bother bringing a ruling on it with just 4 month to go?

    Or was the ruling meant to affect only those cases which have been charged, but put on the judicial backburners?

    Still, the spitefulness of the ruling is palpable and demonstrative of the abyss-like disconnect between our judiciary and public opinion.

  3. […] S. 13 is a long time dying. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: