Party of One

The National Post has a good article up about Maxime Bernier’s People’s Party. It is a very fair article outlining where Max is coming from and the hurdles he faces.

I joined the People’s Party a couple of days ago. Paid my $10.00 for the two-year ride and signed up as a volunteer.

I live in Elizabeth May’s riding. Wealthy, white upper middle class, reactionary enough to return a Green MP and a Green MLA. Not at all Max’s sort of a riding. But what is?

The wonderful urban voters will go Liberal and the suburban voters may vote for Scheer – but I doubt it only because he is simply a paler pink version of the Libs.

The ridings which can be taken by the People’s Party are ridings like mine. Demographically, psychographically this is counter-intuitive. After all, why would fine, rich, white people give up the great privilege of signally their virtue by voting Green in order to vote for an actual conservative party. The Greens will deliver “no change” and as you blast down the Pat Bay Highway in the 911, why would you want change?

While you may not want change, change is going to happen. As the National Post article points out, Bernier is suggesting that we cut back immigration from 325,000 (which is actually closer to 450,000 when you include what might be called temporary immigrants) to 250,000. He is suggesting that we stop pretending that our “carbon tax” will make the least difference to alleged “climate change”. He does not much like marketing boards and he hates deficit spending.

In my riding, the next election is pretty much going to be a referendum on carbon tax. Do we waste a lot of money showing how green we are or do we recognize that Canada has very little impact on climate. It will be about pipelines and making sure they are safe.

But it will also be about Canada’s future. We can do the whole Green thing and the people in this riding will barely notice. My little part of Canada is in the top ten for wealth, the bottom ten for crime and will ride out any minor economic corrections just fine.

Which means a People’s Party candidate can hold Lizzy May’s feet to the fire and push for answers on the Green agenda, immigration and how best to help the poor people of Canada. The People’s Party candidate can go into the First Nation’s communities and ask them how they are doing under the Liberal administration. He or she can talk to older Canadians and ask how they are doing. Obviously, the Porche owning folks are doing fine. But there are two Porches and a hundred banged up Toyotas in the Save on Foods parking lot.

It is hard to be a Party of One. But when Preston Manning did it most of Vancouver Island went Reform.

Is that spirit here?

I don’t know. Running against a national leader (admittedly of one) is a hard thing. But a good ground game and a serious candidate and there’s a shot. Plus, of course, national media because “national leader”.

I’m in. Looking forward to a lot of other people who are fed up.

Tagged

4 thoughts on “Party of One

  1. Terry Rudden says:

    “The People’s Party candidate can go into the First Nation’s communities and ask them how they are doing under the Liberal administration.”

    That’s an interesting question. The only thing I know about Bernier’s stand on Indigenous issues is that he has to date echoed the usual Tom Flanagan/Reform Party position. This is usually articulated as “Repeal the Indian Act” and remove constitutional protection for treaties and land claims settlements.How would you characterize Bernier’s position on self government, the nation-to-nation relationship, and honouring existing agreements?

  2. I think the PPC is open to a grand settlement with indigenous issues, but before we get to that we have to get it elected. I went to a founding PPC meeting in Penticton and wound up on the Board of Directors. I hope other readers are doing the same. The time for action to save this country is now.

    • Terry Rudden says:

      “I think the PPC is open to a grand settlement with indigenous issues.”

      Can you expand on that a bit, Frank? Given that existing treaties rights, including those associated with “modern treaties” or Land Claims Agreements are protected under the Charter and Constitution, what would such a “grand settlement” address?

    • Terry Rudden says:

      Frank, as you’re a founding member and a Director of the Party, I really would like to hear about your policy on Indigenous peoples. I understand it’s early days in the formulation of the Party’s policy positions and strategies, but surely there must be some basic principles at this point?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: